1 Topic by joan

  • joan
  • joan
  • Admin
  • Offline

Hi all,
I am considering moving to calendar versioning. So using version numbers as "2023.1" instead of x.y.z.
It seems apt considering the frequency of releases. I guess it means there might never be an official version 1.0…

There are two popular formats I would consider, YYYY.MM where the second part is the zero padded month, (ex: 2023.03) or YYYY.Minor, where the second part is the release number within that particular year (ex: 2023.1).
What do you think?

2 Reply by petecrowe

  • petecrowe
  • Member
  • Offline

The second one: YYYY.Minor

3 Reply by joan

  • joan
  • joan
  • Admin
  • Offline

Thanks, that's also my preference at the moment.